NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA NVS 310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (20W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
+608%
0.708 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
1
240
Shading Units
48
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
20W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GF119
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
