NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R7 360E
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360E to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 360E 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360E
+127%
1.613 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Dec 2015
GeForce 200
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Tobago
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3
