NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R7 240
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
+41%
0.708 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce 200
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
204W
TDP
30W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Oland
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
Oland PRO
(215-0837015)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
