NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX A1000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM RTX A1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A1000 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1462MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
2064 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
RTX A1000
+851%
6.737 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Apr 2024
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
727 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1462 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
18
240
Shading Units
2304
80
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
72
-
RT Cores
18
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.78 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
105.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.737 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.737 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
105.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GA107
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
