Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs Intel Arc A350

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs Intel Arc A350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 204W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
Arc A350 +333%
3.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

204W
TDP
25W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
DG2-128
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy