Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
4240 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +1683%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2008
Release Date
Sep 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
512bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
70
240
Shading Units
4480
80
TMUs
280
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Board Design

204W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GA100
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy