Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2087MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
3600 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (200W vs 204W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800X +2164%
16.03 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2008
Release Date
Aug 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2087 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
60
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
3840
80
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
200.4 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
500.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.06 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.03 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1002 GFLOPS

Board Design

204W
TDP
200W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
Apple MPX

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Navi 21
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XLA
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy