Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs AMD FirePro W4300

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs AMD FirePro W4300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 204W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300 +101%
1.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2008
Release Date
Dec 2015
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Board Design

204W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Bonaire
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy