Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
656 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 204W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +302%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2008
Release Date
Jul 2020
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
14
240
Shading Units
896
80
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

204W
TDP
80W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
TU116
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy