Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock980MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
1104 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (170W vs 204W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand +272%
2.634 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2008
Release Date
Aug 2013
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
980 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
1344
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.44 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
109.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.634 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
109.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

204W
TDP
170W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GK104
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
GK104-325-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy