Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 204W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400 +405%
3.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

204W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Navi 24
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy