Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
2320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 204W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050 +1809%
13.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2008
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2505 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2640 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
96bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
18
240
Shading Units
2560
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
18
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.48 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

204W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
AD107
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy