Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs NVIDIA P102 100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs NVIDIA P102 100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 and 5GB VRAM P102 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 250W)
NVIDIA P102 100 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1683MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (440.3GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
2960 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
P102 100 +1421%
10.77 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2008
Release Date
Feb 2018
GeForce 200
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1582 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1376 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5X
512bit
Memory Bus
320bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
440.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
25
240
Shading Units
3200
80
TMUs
200
32
ROPs
80
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
0 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
134.6 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
168.3 GFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.77 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
336.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

204W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GP102
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
GP102-100-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy