Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs AMD Radeon R9 290

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs AMD Radeon R9 290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
2320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290 +584%
4.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2008
Release Date
Nov 2013
GeForce 200
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
512bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
40
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
2560
80
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
60.61 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
151.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.849 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
606.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

204W
TDP
275W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Hawaii
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy