Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 204W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
RTX A400 +282%
2.706 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2008
Release Date
Apr 2024
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
6
240
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

204W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GA107
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy