Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
200 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295 +1319%
0.596 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
0.042 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
40
80
TMUs
4
28
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
-
-
-
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

289W
TDP
20W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
RV610
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
RV610 LE AGP (215LKBALA15FG)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy