Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs ATI FireGL V7700

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs ATI FireGL V7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 72.06GB/s)
ATI FireGL V7700 's Advantages
80 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295 +19%
0.596 TFLOPS
FireGL V7700
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1126 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR4
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
72.06GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
16
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

289W
TDP
Unknown
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
RV670
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
RV670 GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy