Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD FireStream 9270

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (160W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270 +101%
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
800
80
TMUs
40
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

289W
TDP
160W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
RV770
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy