Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295 +1224%
0.596 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Aug 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
2
240
Shading Units
16
80
TMUs
8
28
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

289W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
G96C
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy