Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9800 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (125W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295 +77%
0.596 TFLOPS
GeForce 9800 GT
0.336 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jul 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
14
240
Shading Units
112
80
TMUs
56
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
336.0 GFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

289W
TDP
125W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
G92B
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
G92-280-B1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy