Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock980MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1104 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (170W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM +341%
2.634 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Sep 2013
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
980 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
1344
80
TMUs
112
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
224 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.44 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
109.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.634 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
109.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

289W
TDP
170W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GK104
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy