Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1680 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (160W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2060 +982%
6.451 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2019
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1365 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
192bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
30
240
Shading Units
1920
80
TMUs
120
28
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.64 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
201.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.90 TFLOPS
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.451 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
201.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

289W
TDP
160W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
TU106
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
TU106-200A-KA-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy