Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Lower TDP (18W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295 +1428%
0.596 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2011
GeForce 200
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
2
240
Shading Units
16
80
TMUs
8
28
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

289W
TDP
18W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GT218
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy