Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO 's Advantages
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (200W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295 +55%
0.596 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 PRO
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Dec 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
16
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

289W
TDP
200W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
R600
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy