Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD Radeon PRO V710

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD Radeon PRO V710

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 28GB VRAM Radeon PRO V710 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO V710 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (28GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (504.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3216 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (158W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO V710 +4539%
27.65 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Oct 2024
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi(Navi III Series)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
28GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
224bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
504.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
54
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
3456
80
TMUs
216
28
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
54
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
224 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
54 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
192.0 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
432.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.30 TFLOPS
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
27.65 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
864.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

289W
TDP
158W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Navi 32
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
Navi 32
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy