Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro V7350X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1243MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2064 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (200W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V7350X2 +861%
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1188 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1243 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
2304
80
TMUs
144
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

289W
TDP
200W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Ellesmere
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy