Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs ATI FireGL V3600

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs ATI FireGL V3600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
120 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295 +313%
0.596 TFLOPS
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
3
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
120
80
TMUs
8
28
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

289W
TDP
73W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
RV630
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy