Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1201MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
784 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 4100 +312%
2.46 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Nov 2016
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1125 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1201 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.22 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.86 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.460 TFLOPS
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.460 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

289W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Baffin
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
Baffin XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy