Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
VS
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 896SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
656 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (85W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360 896SP +230%
1.971 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2015
GeForce 200
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
14
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
896
80
TMUs
56
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

289W
TDP
85W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Tobago
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
Tobago XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy