Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 460 1024SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 460 1024SP +312%
2.458 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2017
GeForce 200
Generation
Arctic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1090 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.458 TFLOPS
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

289W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Baffin
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
Baffin XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy