Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 5300 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1168 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 +677%
4.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
May 2020
GeForce 200
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1327 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
96bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
22
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
1408
80
TMUs
88
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.64 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
144.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.265 TFLOPS
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.632 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
289.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

289W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Navi 14
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XE
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy