CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
AMD Radeon RX 5300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon RX 5300 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1168 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 289W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300
+677%
4.632 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
VS
Radeon RX 5300
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
May 2020
GeForce 200
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1327 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
96bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
22
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
1408
80
TMUs
88
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.64 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
144.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.265 TFLOPS
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.632 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
289.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
289W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Navi 14
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XE
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA NVS 310
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA T600
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD Radeon Sky 500
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs Intel Arc A780
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1
Related News
1
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
2
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
3
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
4
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
5
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
6
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
7
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
8
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
9
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
10
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy