Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 v2 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
120 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (160W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 96.19GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 460 v2 +95%
1.046 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2011
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 400
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
448bit
96.19GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
7
SM Count
27
336
Shading Units
216
56
TMUs
72
24
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
384 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.91 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
43.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1046 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
87.19 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
182W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF114
GPU Name
GT200
GF114-400-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy