Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1280GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 133.9GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 215W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition
1.089 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +1001%
12 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 400
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
837 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1280MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
133.9GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
22
448
Shading Units
2816
56
TMUs
88
40
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
640 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.02 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
34.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
1089 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

215W
TDP
70W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
AD107
GT215-400-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net