Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800X 's Advantages
Boost Clock2087MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 134.4GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (200W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
1.078 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800X +1387%
16.03 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2021
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2087 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
134.4GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
60
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
3840
64
TMUs
240
48
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
200.4 GPixel/s
33.73 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
500.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.06 TFLOPS
1078 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.03 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1002 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
200W
750 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
Apple MPX

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
Navi 21
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XLA
Fermi
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net