Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
800 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 480
1.345 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 SDI +37%
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2010
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 400
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
15
SM Count
-
480
Shading Units
1280
60
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.03 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
42.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1345 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
168.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
4x SDI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
Cayman
GF100-375-A3
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
Fermi
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy