Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1280GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 152.0GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 210W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
1.312 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +117%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Jul 2020
GeForce 500
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1280MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
152.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
14
448
Shading Units
896
56
TMUs
56
40
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
640 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
40.99 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
164.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

210W
TDP
80W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
TU116
GF110-270-A1
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy