CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 3850 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1280GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (152.0GB/s vs 52.99GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 210W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
+206%
1.312 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3850 AGP
0.428 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
VS
Radeon HD 3850 AGP
Graphics Card
Nov 2011
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 500
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
950 MHz
Memory Clock
828 MHz
Memory
1280MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
152.0GB/s
Bandwidth
52.99GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
448
Shading Units
320
56
TMUs
16
40
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
640 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
20.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.69 GPixel/s
40.99 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.69 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1312 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
427.5 GFLOPS
164.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.50 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
RV670
GF110-270-A1
GPU Variant
RV670 PRO (215-0708003)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Board Design
210W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
2
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 OEM
4
NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
5
AMD Radeon RX 6600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs AMD FirePro W9100
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs MTT S30
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy