Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1280GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 152.0GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 210W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
1.312 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 270 1024SP +44%
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Mar 2015
GeForce 500
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

1280MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
152.0GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
40
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
640 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
40.99 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1312 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
164.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

210W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GF110-270-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy