NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages

Lower TDP (134W vs 175W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 's Advantages

Released 6 years and 4 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 60% (1650MHz vs 1032MHz)

More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 144.2GB/s)

1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

1.585 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER +353%

7.181 TFLOPS

Blender

GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

111

GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER +1939%

2264

OctaneBench

GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

23

GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER +917%

234

GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

VS

GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

Graphics Card

Mar 2013

Release Date

Jul 2019

GeForce 600

Generation

GeForce 20

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

980 MHz

Base Clock

1470 MHz

1032 MHz

Boost Clock

1650 MHz

1502 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

2GB

Memory Size

8GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

GDDR6

192bit

Memory Bus

256bit

144.2GB/s

Bandwidth

448.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

34

-

Compute Units

-

768

Shading Units

2176

64

TMUs

136

24

ROPs

64

-

Tensor Cores

272

-

RT Cores

34

16 KB (per SMX)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

384 KB

L2 Cache

4 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.51 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

105.6 GPixel/s

66.05 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

224.4 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

14.36 TFLOPS

1.585 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

7.181 TFLOPS

66.05 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

224.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK106

GPU Name

TU106

GK106-240-A1

GPU Variant

TU106-410-A1

Kepler

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

12 nm

2.54 billion

Transistors

10.8 billion

221 mm²

Die Size

445 mm²

Board Design

134W

TDP

175W

300 W

Suggested PSU

450 W

2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C

1x 6-pin

Power Connectors

1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.1

Vulkan

1.3

3.0

CUDA

7.5

5.1

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM

4

NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

6

AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs NVIDIA A2

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs ATI Radeon HD 5570

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs ATI FireGL V3600

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD