CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs AMD Radeon R9 290X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs AMD Radeon R9 290X
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
AMD Radeon R9 290X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages
Boost Clock1032MHz
Lower TDP (134W vs 290W)
AMD Radeon R9 290X 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 144.2GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
1.585 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290X
+255%
5.632 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
VS
Radeon R9 290X
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce 600
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
980 MHz
Base Clock
-
1032 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
512bit
144.2GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
44
768
Shading Units
2816
64
TMUs
176
24
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
384 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
66.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.585 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
66.05 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
Hawaii
GK106-240-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Board Design
134W
TDP
290W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs ATI Radeon HD 5690
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs ATI FirePro V7800
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs AMD Radeon R9 285X
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs AMD Radeon HD 6390
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs ATI Radeon HD 4855
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition
Related News
1
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
2
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
3
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
4
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
5
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
6
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
7
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
8
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
9
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
10
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy