Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (86.40GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 110W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2012
Release Date
Oct 2007
GeForce 600
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
390 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
12.48GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
-
64
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.85 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
59.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1425 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
59.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

110W
TDP
41W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
Floppy

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
RV530
GK106-220-A1
GPU Variant
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
Kepler
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy