Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs ATI FireGL V7700

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs ATI FireGL V7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1058MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 72.06GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680 +553%
3.25 TFLOPS
FireGL V7700
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2012
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 600
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1006 MHz
Base Clock
-
1058 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1126 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
72.06GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
320
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
135.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.250 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
135.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

195W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
RV670
GK104-400-A2
GPU Variant
RV670 GL
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy