Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (1058MHz vs 930MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (65W vs 195W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680 +241%
3.25 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2012
Release Date
Dec 2013
GeForce 600
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1006 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1058 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
512
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
135.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.250 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
135.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

195W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Cape Verde
GK104-400-A2
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy