CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs AMD Radeon R9 380X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs AMD Radeon R9 380X
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
AMD Radeon R9 380X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 380X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 's Advantages
Boost Clock1058MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 182.4GB/s)
AMD Radeon R9 380X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (190W vs 195W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680
3.25 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 380X
+22%
3.973 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 680
1996
Radeon R9 380X
+52%
3050
GeForce GTX 680
VS
Radeon R9 380X
Graphics Card
Mar 2012
Release Date
Nov 2015
GeForce 600
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1006 MHz
Base Clock
-
1058 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1425 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
182.4GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
32
1536
Shading Units
2048
128
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
33.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.04 GPixel/s
135.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.973 TFLOPS
3.250 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.973 TFLOPS
135.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
248.3 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
Antigua
GK104-400-A2
GPU Variant
Antigua XT (215-0877016)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
5 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Board Design
195W
TDP
190W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs AMD Radeon RX 7600
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs AMD FirePro W7100
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs ATI Radeon HD 3550
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy