NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 965M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1150MHz
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition
2.209 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 965M
+6%
2.355 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2012
Release Date
Jan 2016
GeForce 600M
Generation
GeForce 900M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
935 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.80 GPixel/s
92.03 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
73.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.209 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.355 TFLOPS
92.03 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GM206S
N13E-GTX2-A2
GPU Variant
N16E-GR-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
