Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro 575

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro 575

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 575 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon Pro 575 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (217.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition
2.209 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 575 +103%
4.489 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2012
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 600M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1695 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
217.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
32
1536
Shading Units
2048
128
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

23.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
35.07 GPixel/s
92.03 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
140.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.489 TFLOPS
2.209 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.489 TFLOPS
92.03 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
280.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Polaris 20
N13E-GTX2-A2
GPU Variant
Polaris 20 XL (215-0910052)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Board Design

122W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy