Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 690 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 's Advantages
Boost Clock1019MHz
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 690
3.13 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +155%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2012
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
-
1019 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
4096
128
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
130.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.130 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
130.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
300W
700 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Capsaicin
GK104-355-A2
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy