Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 vs ATI FirePro V8800

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 vs ATI FirePro V8800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 690 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1019MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (208W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 690 +18%
3.13 TFLOPS
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2012
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
-
1019 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
1600
128
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
130.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.130 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
130.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
208W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Cypress
GK104-355-A2
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy