Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 690 and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 73% (1762MHz vs 1019MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 690 +15%
3.13 TFLOPS
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2012
Release Date
Apr 2024
GeForce 600
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
1417 MHz
1019 MHz
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
1536
Shading Units
768
128
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
130.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
3.130 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
130.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
50W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA107
GK104-355-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy