Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 vs ATI FireGL V8650

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 vs ATI FireGL V8650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 GM206 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1239MHz
192 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 GM206 +188%
1.269 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Aug 2007
GeForce 700
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1087 MHz
Base Clock
-
1239 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.65 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
39.65 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1269 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
39.65 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

60W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
R600
-
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy